Skip to main content

Does President Clinton make it to Heaven?

I read an article today about President Clinton's investigation of Mormonism where he said he:
"admires the church for its high ethical standards and belief in a celestial kingdom but said the idea of being in heaven without his non-Mormon friends was too much to give up."
Fair enough.  I'd probably give it up, too.

Sometimes missionaries get it wrong.  Sometimes investigators misunderstand.  However, one need only go so far as the common misinterpretation of who can attend LDS worship services to remember that we Mormons have a reputation for being a pretty exclusive group.

(To set that record straight for the three people who read my blog:  Anyone can attend.  Services are every Sunday morning in LDS chapels, most of them are buzzing with believers by 9am.)

Anyway, what about heaven? Do our scriptures bear out the idea that President Clinton's "non-Mormon friends" won't be in heaven with him?  Let's check it out.

Doctrine and Covenants, Section 76 - What is Heaven shaped like?

This is a revelation given to the Prophet Joseph Smith about the "topology" of heaven (among other things).  Specifically, it goes into detail about the characteristics of three kinds of people:  Those that fit in the Telestial Kingdom, those that fit in the Terrestrial Kingdom, and those that fit in the Celestial Kingdom.

The very idea of "fit" might bother some folks.  I suspect that God would like all of His children to reach their highest and best potential.  It saddens me to know that some of my children might not reach their full potential, but wherever they are in relation to that, my love and relationship with them will accommodate.  I suppose it is the same with God.

Anyway, Christ taught Abraham that such is the nature of our spirits.  They are independent beings with free agency, which God will not strip from us.  Thus we have in Abraham 3:19 (note that the word "intelligence" here roughly refers to spiritual growth):.
19 And the Lord said unto me: These two facts do exist, that there are two spirits, one being more intelligent than the other; there shall be another more intelligent than they; I am the Lord thy God, I am more intelligent than they all.
Given that, I don't see anything in section 76 nor Abraham that preclude someone from another faith getting into heaven.

C.S. Lewis compared the topology of the afterlife to the size of our spirit.  In The Great Divorce, hell is a very, very small place where only the smallest of spirits can fit.  The protagonist of the book, as he grows spiritually in the afterlife, finds that hell gets smaller and smaller to his eyes, but it is actually he who is getting bigger and bigger.  Spiritual growth is ultimately up to the individual, and all options are open to him as to whether he would like to ascend or descend.

I think this description of heaven fits pretty well with LDS doctrine.  It certainly isn't a perfect fit, but it offers a good rationale behind the idea of a hierarchy in heaven.

Doctrine and Covenants, Section 88 and Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pg. 356 - Who can go there?

Section 88 is called "The Olive Leaf" by many Latter-Day Saints because Joseph Smith referred to is as "an olive leaf...plucked from the tree of paradise".  I'm no scholar, but this has always been one of my favorite sections of the D&C.  In fact, it holds my favorite D&C verses, D&C 88:63-64.

In this section, I believe we find the overarching qualification in verses 22-24:
22 For he who is not able to abide the law of a celestial kingdom cannot abide celestial glory.

23 And he who cannot abide the law of a terrestrial kingdom cannot abide a terrestrial glory.

24 And he who cannot abide the law of a telestial kingdom cannot abide a telestial glory; therefore he is not meet for a kingdom of glory. Therefore he must abide a kingdom which is not a kingdom of glory.
I like these verses because they plant the individuals ultimate destination back in his hands.  To what degree did you use this mortal life to prepare yourself to follow these heavenly laws? Depending on your own abilities there is a kingdom prepared for you by God.  Again, it depends on your own choices whether you ascend or descend.

To go further, Joseph Smith explains in a discourse found in Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith:
All sin, and all blasphemies, and every transgression, except one, that man can be guilty of, may be forgiven; and there is a salvation for all men, either in this world or the world to come, who have not committed the unpardonable sin, there being a provision either in this world or the world of spirits.
The plan the Lord has for his children is big.  It is much bigger than what religion you are.

Doctrine and Covenants, Section 21 and 128 and Alma 34 - Then, can't I just be a good person?

There is a corporate part to the gospel of Jesus Christ.  There are doctrines, but there are also covenants.  To be able to "abide the law" in any land, it is important to understand the law, but citizenship in that land is also important.  While covenants are much richer, more meaningful, and more nuanced than a simple driver's license or social security card, these serve my purpose for the time being.

Christ asks from us that we exhibit faith, repent, are baptized, and receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.  The last two are related to covenants that we make with Christ, which act as evidence of our membership in the body of Christ.  Christ requires these of everyone (John 3:5), lest they not be able to enter the kingdom of God (the Celestial Kingdom, in LDS terminology).

While LDS doctrine expands on this common Christian belief, I think it is good to note here that it is the Bible that states that the covenants made at baptism are the gate by which all must enter the kingdom of heaven, if they are to enter at all.

So, what about Latter-Day Saints? It comes down to a question of authority.  C.S. Lewis talked at great length about the importance of authority, which I really appreciate, but is not my topic here.  You can find a good rendering of it in The Weight of Glory.  For brevity's sake, please accept my notion that authority or permission to do something in God's name is important.

Anyway, Doctrine and Covenants 22 states that baptism must be done by proper authority in order to be valid.  The main premise of the LDS Church's existence is one of Restoration; the authority to baptize was lost, and it was restored to Joseph Smith by God.  Doctrine and Covenants 1 teaches that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is the one church with that authority.

Does that mean that President Clinton (or those missionaries) were right? It is true that we need to be baptized by property authority, which narrows the options, especially for those who were born before the LDS Church existed or those who never heard Christ's message.  Fortunately we have D&C 128 which teaches the doctrine of vicarious ordinances.  It means that one person can perform the physical ordinance for someone else when they are not able to.  LDS doctrine teaches that when a person has already passed, but did not get baptized, an individual may be baptized on their behalf.

We believe in an afterlife and in a soul's continuing agency in that afterlife.  After a living person has been vicariously baptized for a deceased person, then that soul can make the covenant with Christ which allows that person through the same heavenly gate.

So, why not just let the Mormons baptize everyone vicariously and stop bugging everyone with missionaries at the door? There are several reasons, but the main one is because it is everyone's duty as a child of God to do their very best with the time that has been given them here.  A Book of Mormon prophet, Amulek, said:
32 For behold, this life is the time for men to prepare to meet God; yea, behold the day of this life is the day for men to perform their labors.

33 And now, as I said unto you before, as ye have had so many witnesses, therefore, I beseech of you that ye do not procrastinate the day of your repentance until the end; for after this day of life, which is given us to prepare for eternity, behold, if we do not improve our time while in this life, then cometh the night of darkness wherein there can be no labor performed.
So there you have it.  Latter-Day Saints teach that you need to be baptized by proper authority, that there is a contingency plan for the imperfection of our mortal missionary efforts, and that we all need to
do the best we can to get there each day.

Do LDS say that only they will be in heaven?

No, though there is a bit of confusion, I think.  Everyone needs to exhibit faith, repent, be baptized by the proper authority, receive the gift of the Holy Ghost, and endure to the end; Christ said as much, and I believe Him.

I think the confusion comes in because the modern Latter-Day Saint culture has embedded within it a high level of work ethic, productivity, and community involvement.  To be a Latter-Day Saint is hard but rewarding work.  Because of that, we as Latter-Day Saints will fall too much on the side of works every once in a while.  I think if you were walking along the straight and narrow path and saw someone whiz by on a bicycle, you might think that such is the way to get there.  Some Latter-Day Saints might inadvertently demonstrate that if you don't can veggies every year, do your family genealogy, and like BYU football, that you won't be saved.

God doesn't ask for that, though (thank heavens, cuz I went to the U).  He asks that we exhibit faith, repent, be baptized by the property authority, and receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.  He asks for endurance in our belief in Christ thereafter, which implies willingness to obey His commandments (e.g. you can't just get baptized and then lift all the candy bars you want from the Kwik-E-Mart).

So, I'll get baptized in all the faiths, and then I'll be covered, right?

This is kind of a silly side note since I'm not sure if anyone has seriously considered actually doing it, but to come full circle in this post, there is a qualification for the kingdom of God apophatically defined  in Doctrine and Covenants 76:79:
79 These [in the Terrestrial Kingdom] are they who are not valiant in the testimony of Jesus; wherefore, they obtain not the crown over the kingdom of our God.
I'm definitely not the right guy to judge whether you can be valiant or not with this sort of an approach, but joining The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is hard work (see James 2:17-18).  I'd be pretty doubtful of a person's chances who go baptized for the "checklist" aspect of it.

Does he go to heaven or not?

Happily, that isn't up to me! The qualifications are faith, repentance, baptism by proper authority, receiving the gift of the Holy Ghost, and endurance to the end.  The road is the same for everyone however you may have gotten there in the first place.

It does occur to me, though, that we individual Latter-Day Saints might inadvertently put some Country Club gates in front of "Heaven's Gate" that communicate an air of exclusivity that simply is unattractive to the onlooker.  Really, Christ's banquet is big enough for everyone to sit down and feast at.

I think President Hinckley summarized it best when he said:
This must be our great and singular message to the world. We do not offer it with boasting. We testify in humility but with gravity and absolute sincerity. We invite all, the whole earth, to listen to this account and take measure of its truth. God bless us as those who believe in His divine manifestations and help us to extend knowledge of these great and marvelous occurrences to all who will listen. To these we say in a spirit of love, bring with you all that you have of good and truth which you have received from whatever source, and come and let us see if we may add to it.
Sounds pretty inclusive.  May we all do the very best we can today on our journey home.  May we find each other there at the end.


Popular posts from this blog

How Many Teeth Does The Tooth Fairy Pick Up Each Night in Utah?

Somebody asked me a question about my Tooth Fairy post the other day that got me thinking. How many baby teeth are lost every day in Utah? I began with Googling. Surely someone else has thought of this and run some numbers, right? Lo, there is a tooth fairy site that claims that the Tooth Fairy collects 300,000 teeth per night . That's a lot; however, when I ran the numbers, it started to seem awfully low. Let's assume that the Tooth Fairy collects all baby teeth regardless of quality and we assume that all children lose all their baby teeth. The world population of children sits at 2.2 billion , with 74.2 million of them in the United States. Of those, approximately 896,961 of them are in Utah . This means that somewhere around .04077% of the world's children are in Utah. If we assume that kids in Utah lose teeth at the same rate as all other children in the world and that each day in the year is just as likely as the rest to lose a tooth, then we have that of

BYU and the Sunday Compromise?

I read an article by Brad Rock this morning where he quoted heavily from Dr. Thomas Forsthoefel who was giving his opinion on religious institutions being involved in sports . BYU , of course, came up. I think Forsthoefel came off sounding a bit misinformed about the culture, drive, mission, etc. of BYU . Below is the email that I sent to Brad Rock this morning after finishing the article: Brad - That was an interesting article. I tend to disagree with Forsthoefel, though, or at least disagree with what I may have read into his comments. A quote in your article says: "There may be a kind of growing pain. BYU is in the real world and the real world works on Sunday. Can we (BYU) live with the adjustment? I'm empathetic with that, whatever decision is made, people are going to be unhappy.… Some will say get with the program, we'll be OK at the next level, others will say we've sold out and we've made a deal with the world." This seems to suggest one o

Baby Names: What my daughter's name has to do with an ancient Persian Fairy Tales

If you read my previous post on my sons' names, you'll know that this post is about my daughters' names. When we found out that we were going to have twins, I vowed that there names were not going to rhyme or alliterate. We weren't going to do Jadyn and Jordan, or Kim and Tim, or Esther and Edgar (all likely candidates for other, less elitist parents, especially Esther and Edgar). I did want the names to have something to do with one another somehow. Felicity Mae Cummings Felicity's first name has little to do with its underlying Hebrew meaning or its tie to Biblical history and everything to do with the fact that this was a name that Kristi had always wanted one of her girls to have because she liked that it meant "happiness". So, to tell you the truth, I didn't do a lot of research on this name because its place in our family had already been decided. But, it was excellent material to work with. The initial spark that 'Felicity' pro